By Day 1 of Week Five, the instructor will send you two de-identified

Grant Proposal – Peer Reviews

By Day 1 of Week Five, the instructor will send you two de-identified grant proposals to review for this assignment . You will play the role of a grant reviewer by reading and giving feedback to two other students’ grant proposals (proposals will be assigned at random).

The Grant Proposal – Peer Reviews

* Must be three pages double spaced (not including the title or reference pages) and formatted according to APA format.

* Must address the following areas of the proposal you are reviewing:

* Specific Aims: Does the proposed study seem adequate to achieve these specific aims?

* Background: Does the literature review justify the need for the study? Are there any gaps or missing data in the literature review?

* Significance: Does the proposed study improve scientific knowledge, technical capability and/or clinical practice?

* Proposed Study: Does the proposed study methodology answer the hypotheses listed in the Background section? Is the proposed methodology sufficient to achieve the stated specific aims?

* Must include a separate title page with the following:

* Title of paper you are reviewing

* Reviewer’s  name

* Course name and number

* Instructor’s name

* Date submitted

* Must use at least one peer-reviewed source in addition to the course text.

* Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

* Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

"WE'VE HAD A GOOD SUCCESS RATE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH SCHOLAR WRITERS AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT"